At 07:43 15-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute)
to consider the following document:
- 'A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers'
<draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
draft-ietf-repute-model is a down-ref. I suggest referencing the
updated SPF specification as that specification is said to fix some
issues in RFC 4408.
Why is DKIM and SPF normatively referenced while SMTP is an
informative reference?
Section 5 states that the draft "is primarily an IANA action and
doesn't describe any protocols or protocol elements". Why is the
intended status "Proposed Standard"?
Regards,
-sm