Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/08/13 17:01, Joe Touch wrote:

However, see my other message - it's hard to recommend an approach when
we don't understand the problem you're trying to solve.

The scenario is simple.

You want admin to open one port in the firewall when the project is started. Going through the corporate process at this point is bearable and makes sense.

Afterwards, you want to be able to expose arbitrary services through that port without having to go through port-opening process over and over again.

The services are actually different aspects of the same distributed application, say, data distribution service, management service, heartbeating service etc. so not requiring additional process for adding them makes sense.

The real problem here IMO is how to distinguish between "adding a completely new application" -- which should require approval process -- and "adding a new component within an existing distributed application" -- which should be managed by devs themselves.

Martin





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]