Re: procedural question with remote participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: procedural question with remote participation
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:25:42 -0400
Cc: "&lt,ietf@xxxxxxxx&gt," <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51FEB793.3050506@gmail.com>

I'm less concerned about having slides than having the issues that need discussion clear. An agenda of documents and issues tells potential participants what they need. Slides are needed if and only if there is no document.

References:
- Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation
  - From: Olle E. Johansson
- Re: procedural question with remote participation
  - From: Michael Richardson
- Re: procedural question with remote participation
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: procedural question with remote participation
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: procedural question with remote participation
Next by Date: Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
Previous by thread: Re: procedural question with remote participation
Next by thread: Re: procedural question with remote participation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]