Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/08/13 17:12, Joe Touch wrote:

The real problem here IMO is how to distinguish between "adding a
completely new application" -- which should require approval process --
and "adding a new component within an existing distributed application"
-- which should be managed by devs themselves.

IMO it's easy - any group of services you want others to be able to use
independently could justify a new port, but you can always mux them all
together if you want to avoid additional firewall configuration issues.

So what would you use for muxing, if TCPMUX is not a good idea?

I.e., this is your call. But it doesn't appear to have anything to do
with the notion of a single port to access any *existing* service, which
is what TCPMUX and its descendants does.

Martin





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]