Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Saturday, August 10, 2013 11:14 -0400 Ted Lemon
<ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Most of this thread has ignored the IETF's own rules and
>> criteria.  As such, it's wasteful, at best, though I think
>> it's actually destructive, since it provides fuel to the view
>> that the IETF is a questionable venue for standards work.
> 
> +1

+1 more.  Not doing this sort of thing to ourselves is probably
far more important, in the long run, than trying to slightly
re-tune the language of 2026 in that hope that will impress
someone.  The latter might still be worthwhile, but it is, IMO,
far more important to stop shooting ourselves in the foot.

   john









[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]