On Aug 8, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We might reach consensus that it's OK to release change control over > the Tao (although I'm not sure I agree with that - what's so hard about > keeping it under an RFC-like license?). Nothing is "hard" about it. The question is whether granting a different license will help the goals of the Tao more than the current license. Many people (including me, the current editor) think that a lighter-weight license would get the Tao read by more people. --Paul Hoffman