IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: inquiry re. the state of protocol R&D
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering"
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering"
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering"
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering"
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-filtering-considerations-06.txt, "Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering"
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Mark Andrews
• IAB Call for review
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• inquiry re. the state of protocol R&D
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05
  • From: Black, David
• RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ken Gray (kegray)
• Re: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ken Gray (kegray)
• RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Henrik Levkowetz: Re: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: 2.4.7
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• RE: [nvo3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-06.txt> (Framework for DC Network Virtualization) to Informational RFC
  • From: Linda Dunbar
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Eric Dynamic
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Avri Doria
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Eric Dynamic
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: S Moonesamy
• DMARC: A solution using ATPS RFC6541 extension
  • From: Hector Santos
• NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers
  • From: Michael Richardson
• NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's
  • From: Eric Dynamic
• Re: Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Internet 2020 Goals
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: history of From: validation, was DMARC-4-ML
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: history of From: validation, was DMARC-4-ML
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: John C Klensin
• DMARC-4-ML: Can the IETF call a demonstration?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eric Rosen
• YOUcan Make the Binary Decisions....ou take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed...with ICANN IANA and IBM
  • From: Techno CAT
• Call for Nominations: 2015 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Appointment of Sean Turner to the ISOC Board of Trustees
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Fwd: UPDATED Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr U.S. Attorney General on ICANN IANA MLM
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Avri Doria
• Constructive suggestions/ alternatives (was: )e: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Fwd: UPDATED Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr U.S. Attorney General on ICANN IANA MLM
  • From: Randy Bush
• Fwd: UPDATED Mr. Eric H. Holder, Jr U.S. Attorney General on ICANN IANA MLM
  • From: Techno CAT
• The #ICANN #IANA #ISOC #IETF Transition has TWO paths ~#YOUcan make the Binary Choice ~.MARS supports AVATARS that develop FREE CODE you use
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Applied Networking Research Prize 2014 presentation s at IETF-90
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
• RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• The #ICANN #IANA Transition has TWO paths - #YOUcan make the Binary Choice - IS a CENTRAL .NET CZAR needed or not ? #ISOC #IETF say yes ....
  • From: Techno CAT
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-implementer-obligations-01.txt> (Expectations of Implementers of IETF Protocols) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-15.txt> (A YANG Data Model for System Management) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Martin Bjorklund
• Genart LC and telechat review: draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-19
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: CLUE WG Virtual Interim Meeting, May 29, 2014
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Large market player
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Large market player
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04.txt> (Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM) to Informational RFC
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• IETF Website Revamp SOW Review Round Two
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: Raphaël Durand
• AW: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04.txt> (Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ruediger.Geib
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• RE: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04.txt> (Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM) to Informational RFC
  • From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
• Re: Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: Paul Wouters
• AW: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04.txt> (Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ruediger.Geib
• AW: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04.txt> (Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ruediger.Geib
• Re: Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: Salvatore Loreto
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC
  • From: Rene Struik
• Trust and provacy problems with draft-loreto-httpbis-explicitly-auth-proxy
  • From: Raphaël Durand
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Not Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Fwd: Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• NETmundial summary
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: Fwd: Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Regarding IKEv2 REDIRECT problem (reference RFC 5685)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: t.p.
• Regarding IKEv2 REDIRECT problem (reference RFC 5685)
  • From: vijay kn
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Workshop effects [Re: The IETF environment]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Appointments
  • From: IAB Chair
• Commenting on/ reviewing Independent Submissions (was: Re: Enough DMARC whinging)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• RE: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Chaitanya Dhareshwar
• Re: Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Mitch Rodrigues
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Call for volunteers for C/C++ API liaison manager
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Christian de Larrinaga
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: ned+ietf
• IAB Sends Comments to ICANN on the Transition NTIA’s Stewardship of the IANA Functions
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Enough DMARC whinging
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Paul Ferguson
• Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-eastlake-iana-cfm-considerations-01
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Extension of Call for Nominations: Jonathan B. Postel Service Award
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• CORRECTIONS: Nominations Sought for 2014 Jonathan B. Postel Service Award are extended to 16 May 2014.
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Black, David
• Workshop effects [Re: The IETF environment]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Avri Doria
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• RE: The IETF environment
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-18
  • From: Black, David
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: manning bill
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: Tero Kivinen
• Re: [precis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-framework-15.txt> (PRECIS Framework: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: The IETF environment
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: The IETF environment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• The IETF environment (was: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists)
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: NetMundial
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-eastlake-iana-cfm-considerations-01
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: [precis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-framework-15.txt> (PRECIS Framework: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: empty from, was Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Franck Martin
• Re: [precis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-framework-15.txt> (PRECIS Framework: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: empty from, was Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Mitch Rodrigues
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Don't shoot the messenger... AOL is publishing DMARC p=reject as of today.
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Don't shoot the messenger... AOL is publishing DMARC p=reject as of today.
  • From: John Levine
• Don't shoot the messenger... AOL is publishing DMARC p=reject as of today.
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Thanks for improved editing function over at the rfc-editor
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Review of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-04
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: PUTMAN, Tony (Tony)
• Thanks for improved editing function over at the rfc-editor
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Rolf E. Sonneveld
• Re: Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Logging into the datatracker
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Barton
• Somebody always claims something (was Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Dave Crocker
• One size doesn't fit all [Re: DMARC ....]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC not-WG, was "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC not-WG, was "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC not-WG, was "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: John Levine
• Author disclosures and conflict of interest
  • From: Lawrence Rosen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Jeffrey Altman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• NetMundial
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Open source running code or closed industry code (was Re: "why I quit writing internet standards")
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• [off-off-track] Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: tytso
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: tytso
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-resnick-on-consensus-07.txt
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: PUTMAN, Tony (Tony)
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Benoit Claise
• RE: Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: l.wood
• Internet Technology Adoption and Transition
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-itat-report, "Report from the IAB workshop on Internet Technology Adoption and Transition (ITAT)"
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Call for Review of draft-iab-itat-report, "Report from the IAB workshop on Internet Technology Adoption and Transition (ITAT)"
  • From: IAB Chair
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Sam K. Aldrin
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Nobo Akiya (nobo)
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: [Recentattendees] ACTION: 2014 Meeting Venue Preference Survey
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-02.txt> (Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)) to Internet Standard
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• We need to add the ability to upload attachments to the IPR Filings.
  • From: TGLASSEY
• IETFer's work received ACM Computing Review
  • From: Aaron Yi DING
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Nadeau
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: l.wood
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: tytso
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17
  • From: Black, David
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-cc-workshop-report-01, "Report from the IAB/IRTF Workshop on Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Communication"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: SDN and Routing Protocols
  • From: Scott Brim
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Call for Review of draft-iab-cc-workshop-report-01, "Report from the IAB/IRTF Workshop on Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Communication"
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• RE: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Thomas Clausen
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John R. Levine
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Michael Richardson
• (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re[2]: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: "why I quit writing internet standards"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: DMARC and yahoo
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)