On 23/07/2014 04:33, Jari Arkko wrote: > Andrew, > >> Since we're clarifying, I'm wondering whether you mean moderation in >> the way it usually does, or in the way it socially does. >> >> That is, is the plan to turn on the moderation feature of mailman? Or >> is the plan instead to have a group of people who are basically much >> more active seargents-at-arms, catching people when they go over the >> line and then moderating those individuals quickly if things continue >> to proceed? Your text seemed to suggest the latter, but in the >> context of mailing lists "moderation" usually means the former. > > I was on the latter plan. Personally, and I think this is what the IESG wanted to see. So, I have to repeat the question that someone else asked: aren't you just proposing to have the sergeant-at-arms job performed more aggressively? (Not that I am criticising Jordi in any way - he has been limiting himself to fairly extreme cases, and he's been dinged for doing even that minimum.) Brian