|
Hi Roni,
>> I was wondering if this document should say that it updates RFC5561 (specifically section 10)
Yes, section 10 of RFC 5561 talks about ipv4-enabling by default in LDP unless disabled explicitly.
The RFC however does not specify any extension/procedure as per se for this.
Our I.D. is adding such a capability to be able to “disable” ipv4 or ipv6 (as well as PW FEC 128/129)
and is not extending or changing any of this (RFC 5561). So I am not sure
if this doc has to be tagged
as “Updates RFC 5561”.
Rgds,
—
Kamran
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 1:52 AM To: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gen-art@xxxxxxxx" <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-07 Resent-From: <draft-alias-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Resent-To: <afarrel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <loa@xxxxx>, <martin.vigoureux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rcallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <sboutros@xxxxxxxxx>, Syed Kamran Raza <skraza@xxxxxxxxx>, <swallow@xxxxxxxxx> Resent-Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 1:52 AM I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-07 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2014–5-6 IETF LC End Date: 2014–5-12 IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as Standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: I was wondering if this document should say that it updates RFC5561 (specifically section 10) |