Re: [saag] Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:20:45PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >Rene's concern however is partly about people getting a false sense of
> >security and not bothering with anything else once they have
> >unauthenticated encryption everywhere.
> 
> That is why FreeS/WAN did not do anonymous IPsec back in 1997. Boy I
> wish we had come to a different conclusions at the time. Today, it's
> only become more obvious that we need to do this, and yes not bother
> the user with a GUI if it is unauthenticated.

If the app/user would fallback to cleartext, then yes.

(I also wish that Dan McDonald's IP_SEC_OPT socket option from back in
1996-ish -which much later inspired RFC5660- had gotten momentum then
too.  We wouldn't have to have TCP-layer crypto protocols now.)

Nico
-- 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]