|
Vint,
not participating in the DTN effort was a suggestion you made when we discussed the Bundle Protocol while walking around the golf course at IETF Dublin in July 2008, after I raised concerns about the Bundle Protocol work being rushed and not being technically sufficient.
Since that conversation, we have done the first in-space tests of bundle use from the UK-DMC satellite, we wrote the "A Bundle of Problems" paper that has belatedly been recognised as identifying problems with the Bundle Protocol... Those and other contributions would simply not have happened had I followed your suggestion then.
In hindsight, do you think that was a good suggestion?
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn From: Vint Cerf <vint@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2014 10:29 PM To: Wood L Dr (Electronic Eng) Cc: dtn@xxxxxxxx; dtn-interest; IAB IAB; IETF-Discussion list; IESG Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea ok, you don't need to participate in the WG if it is formed, Lloyd.
vint
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:28 PM, <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not going to be attending the DTNWG BOF remotely, as it's |