Re: Moderation on ietf@xxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/22/2014 01:07 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
At 12:16 PM 7/22/2014, IETF Chair wrote:

This message proposes a problem exists and then without any discussion
announces a decision.
I want to clarify what the mail said. It said we are planning to do this and called for feedback. A decision will be made after discussion.

Jari

Hi Jari  -

"Planning to do this" implies "we've already decided and it will go forward unless something changes.

Perhaps instead - "We're considering approaches to manage noise on the IETF list.  One possibility discussed by the IESG is providing moderators to remonstrate with the noise producers prior to action by the sergeant-at-arms.  The IESG would like to solicit comments on this and also solicit guidance on other possibilities prior to making any decision".

Mike,

This is what I thought we were doing. Thanks for sending text.

Spencer, speaking as 1/16th of the IESG





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]