Individual submission (was: Best Effort Key Management)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave,
At 07:49 06-08-2014, Dave Crocker wrote:
We have?  What consensus process was that?

This is an individual submission.  The repeated citation of previous
discussions in saag, as if they resolved issues, is a basic and serious
error in IETF process.

As background information, I have an individual submission which was discussed on three mailing lists (the IETF mailing list was saag@). All three mailing lists are public and the relevant Area Director was subscribed to them.

There were issues and, in my personal opinion, they were resolved. I don't consider it as a problem if the same issues are raised during a Last Call. The IETF process side is difficult though as I think [1] that it can be challenged. One problem might be the "this has already been discussed" response without any citation to determine what was the discussion was about and how it ended. The same problem can occur for a working group draft.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. I may be wrong.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]