Re: DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

For me DANE is the critical piece to understanding how the OS protocol
design pattern can raise the floor without lowering the ceiling and
without encouraging a general reduction of security against active
attacks.  The key lies in DNSSEC's authenticated non-existence
functionality.

???

DANE isn't opportunistic security. It is authenticated security policy
and keys. Thats the opposite of opportunistic.

And this is why OS is a bad term. People still don't see this new term
as meaning "do authenticated encryption protocols when possible, anonymous
encryption with fallback to clear if not".

Paul





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]