Re: Adept Encryption: Was: [saag] DANE should be more prominent (Re: Review of: Opportunistic Security -03 preview for comment)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally, I think the probability that we suddenly discover
any significantly better term is negligible. Not because OS
is super-good, but rather because nothing is super-good. And
good-enough should be good-enough here.

In fact, I'd say so its so negligible that attempting to find
such (yet again, maybe for the 8th time?) is counterproductive.

But that doesn't stop folks genuinely trying seemingly, I guess
its too tempting a windmill at which to tilt;-)

But I'd appeal to others to consider this before they chime in
here: is your suggestion really that much better that everyone
will immediately say "yeah, that's the one we wanted!"? If not,
them maybe there's not much point in suggesting it.

S.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]