Re: the ancient location question, was IETF-91 Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12 Aug 2014, at 23:10, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/12/14 1:55 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I understand that Honolulu is closest place in the US to north Asia,
> 
> Strictly speaking, Anchorage is more than 1000 miles closer to Beijing
> (as far as major US cities go) than Honolulu is and Fairbanks is closer
> still, but neither has large enough accomodations for the entire IETF.
> 
> Anyway, I'd rather be in Minneapolis, as well.  It's easy to get to and
> it has very productive meeting space.  I understand it happens
> occasionally but I do wonder how common it is for someone who's an
> active participant to skip a meeting because they simply don't like the
> venue.

It's a big shame that Minneapolis is no longer on the venue list. 
It's my favourite location along with Prague, in terms of venues that maximise the meeting itself.

I doubt I'll be in Hawaii. But I understand why many want a tourist destination, and why we rotate around the continents.

Tim





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]