Re: DMARC and ietf.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 09:26:45AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Regardless of how/if/why/when we process DMARC as a specification, we need to
> decide how ietf.org MTA is going to deal with things.

For what it is worth the postfix-users and postfix-devel mailing lists
don't have any DMARC issues.  Long before DMARC, when DKIM was still
an IETF draft, these lists were changed to not modify the message body
or subject line in any way (no footers and no subject tags).

Rather, the lists only append "List-foo" headers, add a "Sender:"
header and otherwise forward the original message unmodified with
a new envelope.  The result is that the author DKIM signature
remains valid if present.

-- 
	Viktor.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]