On 8/8/14 8:16 AM, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: > - 'Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-08-22. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. FYI, I requested that this last call be rerun due to US incorrectly assigning the status of informational and therefore a 2 week duration on the original. The importance of feedback is underscored by it's intended standards track status. Thank you Joel > Abstract > > > This document specifies how a child zone in the DNS can publish a > record to indicate to a parental agent that it may copy and process > certain records from the child zone. The existence of and value > change of the record may be monitored by a parental agent and acted > on as appropriate. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature