Re: [saag] : DNSSEC PKI semantics and risks (was tangentially: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The reason TRANS does not currently appear to be relevant to the
DNSSEC advocates is that they are simplifying the PKI problem to
exclude consideration of the entire class of attacks that TRANS is
designed to control.

In the real world, excluding consideration of a problem does not make
it go away. So TRANS is very useful and relevant to DNSSEC.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]