IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Last Call: <draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt> (Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt> (Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: Arturo Servin
• RE: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: James Polk
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• RE: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: Arturo Servin
• RE: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: SM
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• RE: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: SM
• Re: Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: John Leslie
• Showing support during IETF LC...
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: DM Abreu
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: Alejandro Acosta
• Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Monday, February 25
  • From: Internet-Drafts Administrator
• Re: draft-gellens-negotiating-human-language-01
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: IETF chair's blog
  • From: Hector Santos
• IETF chair's blog
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: [therightkey] LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Bonjour-dev Digest, Vol 10, Issue 19
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Bonjour-dev Digest, Vol 10, Issue 19
  • From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• Re: [IETF] back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: [IETF] Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Carlos M. martinez
• Re: [P2PSIP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt> (REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bless, Roland (TM)
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: SM
• Re: [P2PSIP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-24.txt> (REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Base Protocol) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Roland Bless
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: [IAOC] Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: proceedings not in archival format
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-terriberry-ipr-license-00.txt
  • From: Timothy B. Terriberry
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: joel jaeggli
• draft-ruoska-encoding-00.txt
  • From: Bill McQuillan
• Re: The IETF is coming to New Delhi!
  • From: Eric Burger
• The IETF is coming to New Delhi!
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [therightkey] LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: proceedings not in archival format
  • From: Alexa Morris
• proceedings not in archival format
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [therightkey] LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [therightkey] LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [therightkey] LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IETF] back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IETF] back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [IETF] back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Internet Draft Initial Version (-00) Cut-Off Monday, February 18
  • From: Internet-Drafts Administrator
• RE: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: SM
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Marco Davids (Prive)
• back by popular demand - a DNS calculator
  • From: Joe Touch
• Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: [paws] Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: GenART LC review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07
  • From: Vincent Roca
• Re: [paws] Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Anthony Mancuso
• Re: [paws] Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Anthony Mancuso
• Re: [paws] Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• IETF Participat Position
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt> (Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• One Week Left To Nominate YOUR Choice for the Internet Hall Of Fame!
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: Sunday IAOC Overview Session
  • From: SM
• Re: Changing the value of RFCs not numbers (was Re: The RFC Acknowledgement)
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Keith Moore
• Changing the value of RFCs not numbers (was Re: The RFC Acknowledgement)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)
  • From: SM
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing-05
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00
  • From: Alvaro Retana (aretana)
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Bradner, Scott
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Jiazi Yi
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: SM
• Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Ulrich Herberg
• Re: Doing something wrong
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: Doing something wrong
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [manet] IETF last call and review of draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt
  • From: Jiazi Yi
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Doing something wrong (was: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups)
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt> (Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Last Call: <draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-02.txt> (Experiences from Cross-Area Work at the IETF) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• VS: [Fwd: Gen-ART LC review of draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-03.txt]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• [Fwd: Gen-ART LC review of draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-03.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-cardenas-dff-09.txt> (Depth-First Forwarding in Unreliable Networks (DFF)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Heide Clausen
• Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• I-D affects another or work in ietf groups
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• The RFC Acknowledgement
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [ANCP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04.txt> (Applicability ofAccess Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks)to Informational RFC
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: [ANCP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04.txt> (Applicability ofAccess Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks)to Informational RFC
  • From: GTW
• Re: IMPORANT: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-08
  • From: Frederick.Hirsch
• IMPORANT: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-08
  • From: Frederick.Hirsch
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: [ANCP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04.txt> (Applicability of Access Node Control Mechanism to PON based Broadband Networks) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: SM
• Re: IMPORANT: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-08
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: SM
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-08
  • From: Frederick.Hirsch
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-07.txt> (MPLS-TP Security Framework) to Informational RFC
  • From: Luyuan Fang (lufang)
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Marc Blanchet
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: SM
• Re: Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-07.txt> (MPLS-TP Security Framework) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: SM
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-07.txt> (MPLS-TP Security Framework) to Informational RFC
  • From: Luyuan Fang (lufang)
• 答复: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Lidan (Dan)
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-07
  • From: Black, David
• 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Lidan (Dan)
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Comments on draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-07.txt
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: SM
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-harkins-brainpool-ike-groups-04
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Remote Participation Services
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Call for Comment: "Issues in Identifier Comparison for SecurityPurposes"
  • From: t.p.
• Remote Participation Services
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: t.p.
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-17
  • From: Samuel Weiler
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt> (Protocol to Access White Space (PAWS) Database: Use Cases and Requirements) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-07.txt> (MPLS-TP Security Framework) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Scott Brim
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Internet Hall of Fame Celebrates Internet Leaders: Second Annual Induction Ceremony Set for June 2013 in Istanbul, Turkey
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: SM
• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: SM
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: SM
• RE: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: 3933 experiments
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 3933 experiments
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Premature termination of IETF last call on draft-farrell-ft
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: Brian Haberman
• IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: tglassey
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Carol Davids
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Matt Mathis
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-08.txt> (Methodology for Benchmarking SIP Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: CRLF
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: John C Klensin
• TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John Day
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: John Day
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: David Morris
• Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John Day
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: Hector Santos
• Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: Tony Finch
• CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-00
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: John Levine
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: John Levine
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: t.p.
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Fwd: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-86
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Johnny Eriksson
• The Implemetation and Running Code MAY be tested [RFC2026]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: t.p.
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: David Morris
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: =JeffH
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Jorge Contreras
• Beta testing of xml2rfc version 2
  • From: IETF Chair
• IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Bits-N-Bites Sponsors Needed for Orlando
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01.txt> (Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf") to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• GenART LC review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Lee Howard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [therightkey] Fwd: Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Fwd: [irtf-discuss] New: Software-Defined Networking Research Group (SDNRG)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• digressive rant on internet fiefdoms
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: S Moonesamy
• draft-moonesamy-mail-list-protocol-00
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: tglassey
• Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Orlando IETF Codesprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• RE: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Gregory Mirsky
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul C. Bryan
• RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Conal Tuohy
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: [radext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-07.txt> (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012
  • From: SM
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: t.p.
• Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: John Day
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: John Levine
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Compliance to a protocol description? (wasRE: I'm struggling with 2219 language again)
  • From: Robin Uyeshiro
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul C. Bryan
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre