IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Call for Comment: 'Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols'
  • From: SM
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: SM
• RE: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: 3933 experiments
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 3933 experiments
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• 3933 experiments (was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC)
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Premature termination of IETF last call on draft-farrell-ft
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: Brian Haberman
• IPv6 update for BCP5?
  • From: tglassey
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Carol Davids
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: t.p.
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt> (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Matt Mathis
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-08.txt> (Methodology for Benchmarking SIP Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-08.txt> (Terminology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Networking Devices) to Informational RFC
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: CRLF
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: John C Klensin
• TSV-DIR review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John Day
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: John Day
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: David Morris
• Vestigial Features (was Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal))
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John Day
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: Hector Santos
• Comments on draft-shafranovich-mime-sql-03
  • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: Tony Finch
• CRLF (was: Re: A modest proposal)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IETF] A modest proposal
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-00
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: John Levine
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 - "acceptable root certificates" ?
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: John Levine
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: t.p.
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Fwd: [irtf-discuss] Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-86
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Gen-art last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Johnny Eriksson
• The Implemetation and Running Code MAY be tested [RFC2026]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: t.p.
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Hannes Tschofenig
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: David Morris
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: A modest proposal
  • From: Melinda Shore
• A modest proposal
  • From: William Jordan
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: =JeffH
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• RE: Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Discussion of BCP79 on the IPR-WG List
  • From: Jorge Contreras
• Beta testing of xml2rfc version 2
  • From: IETF Chair
• IETF Meeting Hotels for 2013
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Last Call: <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01.txt> (Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Bits-N-Bites Sponsors Needed for Orlando
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01.txt> (Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf") to Informational RFC
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Sam Aldrin
• GenART LC review of draft-ietf-rmt-fcast-07
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Lee Howard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08.txt> (An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Mechanisms) to Informational RFC
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [therightkey] Fwd: Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Fwd: [irtf-discuss] New: Software-Defined Networking Research Group (SDNRG)
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Arturo Servin
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• digressive rant on internet fiefdoms
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: S Moonesamy
• draft-moonesamy-mail-list-protocol-00
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-rfc2050-historic-00.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: tglassey
• Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Last Call: <draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05.txt> (Certificate Transparency) to Experimental RFC
  • From: SM
• Orlando IETF Codesprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06.txt> (PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods) to Proposed Standard
  • From: SM
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• RE: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Gregory Mirsky
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Rosoff
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul C. Bryan
• RE: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: neil.2.harrison
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Conal Tuohy
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: [radext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-07.txt> (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012
  • From: SM
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: t.p.
• Mark Crispin: 1956 - 2012
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: John Day
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: John Levine
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Compliance to a protocol description? (wasRE: I'm struggling with 2219 language again)
  • From: Robin Uyeshiro
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul C. Bryan
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: John Day
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Melinda Shore
• A proposal for a scientific approach to this question [was Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again]
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Glen Zorn
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: More cache control for (X)HTML pages
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Thomas Narten
• More cache control for (X)HTML pages
  • From: Nathan
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: SM
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Tony Hain
• Making RFC2119 key language easier to Protocol Readers
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: meaning RFC 2119 (was Re:I'm struggling with 2219 language again)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• meaning RFC 2119 (was Re:I'm struggling with 2219 language again)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephen Kent
• RE: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Peter Saint-Andre
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???
  • From: Mahmoud Emam
• I'm struggling with 2219 language again
  • From: Dean Willis
• RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Tony Hain
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Acoustic couplers (was: WCIT outcome?)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Acoustic couplers
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Acoustic couplers (was: WCIT outcome?)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: t.p.
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [IETF] WCIT outcome?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Acoustic couplers (was: Re: WCIT outcome?)
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John Levine
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: SM
• Re: [IETF] WCIT outcome?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: David Morris
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06
  • From: Bitar, Nabil N
• Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [ih] 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Paul Vixie
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dmitry Burkov
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: SM
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Victor Ndonnang
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
  • From: =JeffH
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: [ih] 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: Victor Ndonnang
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• 30th Anniversary of Transition to TCP/IP
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: John Day
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: SM
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Steven Bellovin
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Greg Shepherd
• travel guide for the next IETF...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: WCIT outcome?
  • From: Jorge Amodio
• WCIT outcome?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Fw: Feedback Requested: Proposed IEEE RAC OUI Tier Restructuring
  • From: t.p.
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [sip-clf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11.txt> (The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Framework and Data Model) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Vijay K. Gurbani
• RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Bharat Joshi
• IETF 93 Venue Announced
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-14.txt> (Automatic Multicast Tunneling) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt> (Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Gonzalo Salgueiro
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt> (Indicating Fax over IP Capability in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Hadriel Kaplan
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: RAMAKRISHNADTV
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-evrc-nw-0
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• draft-bonica-special-purpose-04.txt
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: SM
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Geoff Huston
• RE: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ronald Bonica
• Re: [trill] Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04.txt> (Requirements for Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) in TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)) to Informational RFC
  • From: gayle noble
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• Re: [karp] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Anantha Ramaiah
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [karp] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Happy Holidays & Winter Break Notice
  • From: Steve Conte
• Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-11
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Happy Holidays & Winter Break Notice
  • From: Alexa Morris
• Internet Hall of Fame Celebrates Internet Leaders: Second Annual Induction Ceremony Set for June 2013 in Istanbul, Turkey
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [trill] Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04.txt> (Requirements for Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) in TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)) to Informational RFC
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
  • From: Ben Campbell
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Manger, James H
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
  • From: Paul C. Bryan
• Orlando IETF Codesprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06.txt> (IPv6 and UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: Bill McQuillan
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-06.txt> (IPv6 and UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John William Atwood
• Last call comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-18.
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Osterweil
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [pkix] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-schaad-pkix-rfc2875-bis-03.txt> (Diffie-Hellman Proof-of-Possession Algorithms) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Denis Pinkas
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Morley
• RE: [sip-clf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-11.txt> (The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Framework and Data Model) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-daboo-ical-vcard-parameter-encoding-02
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Running code draft -01
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Markus Lanthaler
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Running code, take 2
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Running code, take 2
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: The notion of "fast tracking" drafts
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Running code, take 2
  • From: John C Klensin
• The notion of "fast tracking" drafts (was: Re: Running code, take 2)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David J. Biesack
• draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07 - array index for end ofarray
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08.txt> (JSON Patch) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David J. Biesack
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: zhou . sujing
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Chuck Mortimore
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nat Sakimura
• RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: zhou . sujing
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Chuck Mortimore
• Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: zhou . sujing
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Chuck Mortimore
• Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-08.txt> (Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0) to Proposed Standard
  • From: zhou . sujing
• Re: Running code, take 2
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: Running code, take 2
  • From: Stephen Farrell