Re: Call for Comment: "RFC Format Requirements and Future Development"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>There should be an immutable requirement that any alternative format
>MUST NOT increase the size by more than a factor of two compared to
>ASCII text.

So you're saying you're unalterably opposed to the RFC editor providing
PDF, HTML, epub, mobipocket, and every other format that people actually
use on modern computers, as well as anything that includes reasonably
legible images?

If that's not what you mean, what DO you mean?  We all seem to agree
that we want to continue to provide the traditional line printer image
format, but on today's Internet where 20Mb/sec cable modems aren't
particularly fast, it's silly to demand that documents be sized for
floppy disks.

R's,
John


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]