Re: Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Today

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There was a fire in the office, three desks away from mine last week during the weekend. Sprinklers came on.
If my computer had either caught fire, or been exposed to too much water (luckily neither happened) the draft would have been lost.

I still fail to see why the solution is to ban *submissions*. It seems like a better solution is one of visibility for those who need to triage.

-=R


On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ned,

On 27/02/2013 19:21, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On 02/27/2013 01:49 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> > On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:18, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >
>> >> routing around obstacles
>> > It turns out for most people the easiest route around is submitting
>> in time.
>> >
>> > That is actually what counts here: how does the rule influence the
>> behavior of people.
>> >
>> > Chair hat: WORKSFORME.  (And, if I could decide it, WONTFIX.)
>> +1.
>
>> As far as I can tell, the deadline actually serves the purpose of
>> getting people to focus on IETF and update their documents sufficiently
>> prior to the meeting, that it's reasonable to expect meeting
>> participants to read the drafts that they intend to discuss.   And I say
>> this as someone who, as an author, has often found the deadline to be
>> very inconvenient.
>
> And your evidence for this is .. what exactly? Yes, the deadline makes the
> drafts show up a bit sooner, but I rather suspect that the overwhelming
> majority of people don't bother to do much reading in the inverval. I
> certainly
> don't.

Just to present another view, I certainly do.

I agree that this is more important for -00 drafts, and that looking at
the diffs *may* be sufficient for updated drafts. However, with hundreds
of documents coming down the pipe shortly before the meeting, I firmly
believe that the two deadlines are essential in order to achieve any
kind of systematic triage and decide what needs careful reading.

I think many of us have a wide range of interests that make this
triage important.

  Brian


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]