Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulrich,
At 13:25 11-02-2013, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
(it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name).

Agreed.

Your comment reminded me of the message at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep/current/msg00085.html

Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and
others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value.
See below:

Agreed.

I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to
this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document,

It was a gentle note to one of the authors (see Note 4).

I pointed to two reviews about a draft and mentioned that the first one was clearer to me.

I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation".
There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned
draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread.

I agree that it is better to stick to the topic. I'll answer in here as to avoid generating two messages. I meant that I have never interacted with the person through email or in person. There is less bias [1]. The content of the message matters; it does not matter who wrote it.

Regards,
-sm

1. www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/notes/snodgrass-tods-2007.pdf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]