I try to include in the Acknowledgements section of any Internet Drafts I edit the names of anyone who comments on the draft if (1) the comment results in a change in the draft and (2) the commenter does not request that they be left out. If you comment on some draft and the draft is changed as a result and you want to be acknowledged and you are not added to the acknowledgements list, you should complain to the editor / author. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am wondering how author/ietf-editor fill in the acknowledgement > section in the RFCs or I-Ds. Does it make sense in IETF, or left for > author opinion? I am getting requests from IETF WGs, IESG, and IAB for > comments. My question is do you *make acknowledgements* in I-Ds or > just *take comments* for I-Ds? > > IMO we get last call request for comments because RFC production is > all about getting volunteering comments from Internet community to > make I-Ds better, so does all I-Ds acknowledge (ACK) to any input > comment before the last call and after or it is only before last > call?, and if it gets submitted to IESG/IAB, and we comment does that > have no ACK in I-D? > > I sometimes feel discouraged to participate in any world work if the > process does not involve my existance, just used with ignoring ACK of > the reviewers. IMO any comment has value to the authors (e.g. some > think only experts' comments are important to ACK) and to IETF, > otherwise, we may delete valuable ACKs in IETF, which is not right. > > Best Regards > > AB > A participant that still did not complete a year working for IETF, but > trying to continue :)