Alright, thanks Ulrich On Feb 11, 2013, at 15:36, SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > At 13:25 11-02-2013, Ulrich Herberg wrote: >> (it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name). > > Agreed. > > Your comment reminded me of the message at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep/current/msg00085.html > >> Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and >> others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value. >> See below: > > Agreed. > >> I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to >> this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document, > > It was a gentle note to one of the authors (see Note 4). > > I pointed to two reviews about a draft and mentioned that the first one was clearer to me. > >> I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation". >> There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned >> draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread. > > I agree that it is better to stick to the topic. I'll answer in here as to avoid generating two messages. I meant that I have never interacted with the person through email or in person. There is less bias [1]. The content of the message matters; it does not matter who wrote it. > > Regards, > -sm > > 1. www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/notes/snodgrass-tods-2007.pdf