Re: Remote Participation Services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/11/13 6:23 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> If you don't, then I imagine they won't be. you're depriving some of
> participants who may not be familiar with your work the opportunity to
> review what you want to discuss. but that's between you and your working
> group chairs.

In theory they should have read any drafts that are on the
agenda.  I used to agree with Keith but I'm drifting more
towards feeling that particularly for remote participants (and
I'm saying this as someone who's done the remote participation
thing upwards of a dozen times) it's helpful to have a
summary of the issues under discussion.  Not every slide set
contains material you should have gotten from reading the
draft.  Some contain material you should have gotten from
reading the mailing list, but even so a summary of issues needing
attention/resolution is useful.

Melinda




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]