On 27/02/2013 09:28, Brian Trammell wrote: > On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Tim Chown <tjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 26 Feb 2013, at 20:28, Martin Rex <mrex@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I have a recurring remote participation problem with the >>> IETF Meeting Agendas, because it specifies the time of WG meeting slots >>> in local time (local to the IETF Meeting), but does not give the >>> local time zone *anywhere*. >>> >>> I would appreciate if the local time zone indication would be added >>> like somewhere at the top of the page, to each IETF meeting agenda. >> So in this interesting discussion of UTC, Martin has actually made an excellent point. Having UTC listings for the agenda would be very helpful, or an alternative agenda showing UTC. > > +1. Given our high remote participation, I put UTC in the agenda for the MILE WG anyway (usually correctly, even). And given that the IETF often meets on one side or another of the DST change in local time, having an unchanging time reference would be helpful even for attendees. UTC time *and* date please, for people in whichever hemisphere happens to be opposite the IETF. Brian