Re: presenting vs discussion in WG meetings (was re:Remote Participation Services)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

AB

On 16/02/13 08:04, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> On 15/02/2013 20:57, Keith Moore wrote:
> ...
>> But this makes me realize that there's a related issue.   An expectation
>> that WG meetings are for presentations, leads to an expectation that
>> there's lots of opportunity to present suggestions for new work to do.
>> WG time scheduled for considering new work can actually take away time
>> for discussion of ongoing work.   And once the time is scheduled and
>> people have made commitments to travel to meetings for the purpose of
>> presenting new work, chairs are understandably reluctant to deny them
>> their allotted presentation time.
>
> This is closely related to a well-known problem at academic conferences.
> Many people can only get funded to travel if they are presenting a paper.
> It's common practice, therefore, to have either a poster session (which
> allows massively parallel presentations) or hot-topics sessions (with a
> strict and very short time-limit). We tend to throw the hot-topics sessions
> into WG meetings, which is not ideal.
>
> Why not have a poster session as part of Bits-n-Bites? It would give
> new ideas a chance to be seen without wasting WG time. Make it official
> enough that people can use it in their travel requests.
>
>     Brian
>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]