On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:16:30 AM Mark Nottingham wrote: > I think that's a poor trade-off. As discussed before, the publishing embargo > disrupts work that isn't in sync with meetings. This is a tangible and > somewhat high price to pay just to serve as a procrastination-buster for > those that need it. > > I'd be willing to deal with an embargo for draft-ietf-*, but don't see at > all why it extends to other drafts. Why embargo working group drafts for groups that aren't meeting? It's a pointless roadblock. Scott K