No disagreement. It is merely *a* way, and, popping back to the original topic, it is better to allow the submission and deny the visibility than to disallow the submission
-=R
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:22 PM, David Morris <dwm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Source control, assuming the traditional server implementation, is one
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Roberto Peon wrote:
> I think you mean backup solution, source control won't help on its own :)
form of backup solution ... but I agree, the requirement is a backup
solution where the backup is protected from the hazards the individual
computer would be subjected to.
Draft submission is hardly the best way to protect work.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 3/4/13 2:53 PM, Roberto Peon wrote:
> > > There was a fire in the office, three desks away from mine last
> > > week during the weekend. Sprinklers came on. If my computer had
> > > either caught fire, or been exposed to too much water (luckily
> > > neither happened) the draft would have been lost.
> >
> > Nothing is stopping you from using source control. :-)