>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Ted> I agree that the current language permits the current
Ted> operational model, because it leaves it up to the NomCom to
Ted> determine how to derive IETF community consensus; it can
Ted> believe the IESG is right,
Ted, up to here we're in agreement.
Ted> as it does now.
I haven't seen evidence of this (nor evidence against; I have no idea
what the nomcom thinks.) I realize you may have seen more information
than is public.
I also agree with dave C that this issue is strategic. I believe that
having this be clear would be valuable.