Re: Call for Comment: "RFC Format Requirements and Future Development"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "t.p." <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <iab@xxxxxxx>; <rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ietf" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: "RFC Format Requirements and Future
Development"


On Mar 1, 2013, at 9:59 AM, t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There should be an immutable requirement that any alternative format
> MUST NOT increase the size by more than a factor of two compared to
> ASCII text.

<tongue position="incheek">
Given Moore's law, would that change 18 months from now to an immutable
requirement of a factor of four?
</tongue>

<tp>
Something of the sort, yes; it is an overnight large increase that
careless users could so easily create which concerns me.

Tom Petch

--Paul Hoffman




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]