On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/24/2013 11:02 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> On 25/02/13 07:56, Arturo Servin wrote: >> >>> If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards should >>> be the way forward. >> >> Moreover, entities controlling these social platforms are, presumably, >> also participating in IETF. So, using these tools would give one party >> unfair advantage -- ability to promote or obscure individual >> discussions/threads/posts, ban users etc. > > Exactly. And it bothers me that we are not making much progress in having our > own remote participant service and have to rely on Webex. Couldn't we use one based on RTCWeb (in the near future)? Best regards Michael > > - -- > Marc Petit-Huguenin > Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org > Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRKw5bAAoJECnERZXWan7ESloQAIbg7xr93BwSjH8cNheN5zBg > CVmoXV7ZqQdzQgZfHDjjwTBk3KSm6y99lzjyMQX3t/tqKWnqJH4jG7dVbtyGHAU8 > +Q5j04tVaJ8S+fShS1SIJ5ySu+vjpTMF932++GkMWVsqklJw/hGDekH63dRdD7cK > k2cQ4rcakHhx8n8rfA/JKRh+bwCN65GJH0+4E/SSf1RQmuYOhIp69lMeAJmb4t/d > kT25XVkvuJlkqVfh3klZf+UwcV6sOnWaxYHsk+JA1K/dr3sAIFLAcju50AaRNgHa > dchB1FvNMt373CBec5qk6qJ06qrKugq9KZsgnHxYR0YnyM6tVrcD1Mq/eHuVPlW9 > SXAlqtEnVBAXoVvNdAMyccrv7i9L/HcHwrsYfUsUmOy3X/PWj1IfNRY6cqyvt6C8 > p72KZTXeitg1pVKFd8PKVgmSPg1C2vO2uji7cpCqPY5JcwoVGOuEVNN4aoXkgvAT > TsD5gm/uQCVI90/g/XGVeth6zGmShbXxsLHfZ4LCDdCEuc0NTOvB119tVw2kpSXT > akmyi5Kl777BUz5x3WUoL4RlbeK6kpFaM7kAW7Uy3lzGnu2+IvwwJQqamhcqLQcv > fngKTC2COHJo+6Wb19/Kpg6wlQG82NTBczlHlPyjeeyG3ZIVdrWs7UA/zX/E+vNc > mziqVf91EVS9WzLE/nK+ > =2NJB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >