Why not? I, my organization and many more (included ISOC) have found them very useful for outreach activities. I do not see why the IETF shouldn't. Please, tell me. as Sent from my iPad On 25 Feb 2013, at 02:21, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@xxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/23/2013 07:38 PM, Arturo Servin wrote: >> >> Very good initiative. >> >> Twitter, Google+, Facebook, etc. could be the next steps. Let's embrace new >> tools to collaborate. > > Let's not. Collaboration based on software running on servers run by the IETF > or a contractor payed by the IETF is fine. Using collaboration tools owned by > the entities you listed, or similar entities, is not. > >> >> Regards, as >> >> On 22/02/2013 20:35, IETF Chair wrote: >>> Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would be possible to >>> provide periodic status reports and other thoughts from the chair. >>> Here's the link: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/ > > > - -- > Marc Petit-Huguenin > Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org > Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRKloIAAoJECnERZXWan7EOMQP/05jtr5JVAQVZJJlP/At7cOx > wEYxU5Z/v5wn21m0BfCqnfFxXhAOP+/vGje785gS+GPZZktnWffQu7JN0TNny8Rn > U4nhgA19x7wdtz0jtTAV92JF4pEI2ZZ8uv74EoLzCobFW+biAy5jJM9mGFy+MqKB > tuXIQpYc5dDRxmQe8szGWoVw6+ycGLfsHgZdeOZGhjPO7cSwnYboQ5w5/4WIhpe/ > Pd9hTvsig0D6dBB3Dwl+rC8T0lzP4+yqHgfF6Y7+kS0rjToWdbA1R87GVxtVip1q > 08HL8DGRicfrxVrpezvQOO3D5aNjbe3tdu3zyff5jZHMg19OLPvM9hE66sFBSuHp > 5pLt2jdTceG5BIwSc0u6+cIbGxFTVTO1+aU86K7SPzxlWNryWbDpPStUKszl7X9h > 8fu7a4A5Jd1o5BgqIqtDNrLbdtrMP4p0emuLOaTA2GayQqfMi3tDlhgzHAF1jgpS > osWxUOhK6kaM441lFr9eJ/fTX130WnreDHoBhh3Fu090jukNZGBwqnSLkFrkqANO > L/4u0Q3YchSvh/NQO4d/mEha+y7vQ202shsT4cgm6OsiPYe5iCoPuPbFlexpPF8m > DQvoOyFjMmyJzpaEkzO0PBXYhgLEIynx/O7vq89/4R3SDU96t+aHnl5nxGmS/NDb > L8j1K0cpZ12CfCaGQevT > =4P1+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----