On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eric Gray <eric.gray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mary, > > There's a difference between evaluating someone based on what they said (as you > point out is part of the NomCom's job) and evaluating someone based on what somebody else > said about what they said. > > If - in the latter case - someone offering feedback based strictly on what a candidate > had to say about themselves was completely up-front about that, then the NomCom could try > to factor that in when considering the feedback. > I don't think that it is a good idea to try to rely on people to do this, nor do I think it is > completely obvious how someone on the NomCom could necessarily arrive at a really good > way to "factor that in." [MB] Honestly, as it is now, the context for feedback is often totally unknown to the Nomcom. I can't see that someone offering feedback based on public input from the nominee is any less credible that the information that Nomcom gets now. My point is that nominees providing this information makes it easier for someone providing input to provide concrete context and adequate detail to add value to the process. Folks do not remember everything that a person has done. They usually only remember the most recent things. The process is quite flawed IMHO right now in terms of the quality and quantity of input that nomcom must rely on to make their decisions. [/MB] >> > Your second point is certainly valid. There is no doubt that a personal CV from each > candidate would help everyone. So maybe we're just quibbling over exactly what sorts of > candidate responses it would be helpful to disclose. [MB] Take a look at the position questionnaires: https://www.ietf.org/group/nomcom/2012/iesg-questionnaire If I were to post my responses that I provided to this year's nomcom, I would only need to make some minor changes in terms of anonymizing and abstracting a few of my comments. We can decide where to draw the line in terms of what sections to provide, as well. If anyone does have lots of concerns about this, it would make me wonder exactly how they are positioning themselves to the nomcom. [/MB] > > :-) > -- > Eric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:22 PM > To: Eric Gray > Cc: Bob Hinden; dcrocker@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD > Importance: High > > Eric, > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Eric Gray <eric.gray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bob, >> >> This confuses me. Are you saying that you would be more able >> to give feedback on someone you don't know if you knew what they might have to say about themselves? >> >> I would think that - if you don't know somebody - you can't >> give feedback on them (and that is precisely as it should be). > [MB] This then begs the question in my opinion as to how Nomcom can evaluate nominees from the questionnaires then? > > Also, As I noted in my previous response, even when you know someone you likely don't know everything about what they have accomplished or you have forgotten some things. [/MB] >> >> -- >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf >> Of Bob Hinden >> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:45 PM >> To: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx >> Cc: Bob Hinden; ietf@xxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD >> >> Hi, >> >>> Just to be clear: I am not suggesting public discussion. I'm suggesting that candidates make their responses available to the community, so the community can have additional information for providing feedback to the Nomcom. >> >> I agree with Dave on this. >> >> I try to give feedback on the NomCom lists of candidates. For people I know, I can do this, for people I don't know well it's difficult. It would help me if I could read some of the material they submitted with their acceptance of the nomination to see why they want the job, and their qualifications and experience. >> >> The IETF has grown a lot over the years to the point where most people don't know all of the candidates. >> >> Bob >>