Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 06:51:26 -0900
Cc: SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CADnDZ89=gwB8nAJOAmQz0GLCwkD7ZYYvF=M0PQ5yhK3OCtg3yw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 2/15/13 3:04 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> I agree that many don't understand how consensus is targeted. Suggest
> that the draft to be more related to participant discussions and
> reasonable disputes. 

Absolutely not.

Melinda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  - From: Randy Bush

References:
- Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
  - From: Abdussalam Baryun

Prev by Date: Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
Next by Date: Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
Previous by thread: Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
Next by thread: Re: Musing on draft-resnick-on-consensus-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]