Re: proceedings not in archival format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael,

You're quite correct -- our proceedings documents are supposed to be maintained in PDF. I'm not sure what the issue is here but I can assure you that I'm looking into it and that we will get this addressed as quickly as possible.

Regards,
Alexa

On Feb 16, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:

> 
> I could not recall the name of a vendor who was at the Bits'n'Bites in
> Atlanta.   So I went to
> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/85/bits-n-bites.html, but the list wasn't
> there.  Since it said that they'd get an ackledgement in the plenary, I 
> went to: 
>  https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/technical-plenary.html
> 
> looking for the right slide.  
> 
> Why are there .pptx files there?
> a) It's not an archival quality format (HTML or PDF/A)
> b) According to our openstand principles it's hardly a standard.
> 
> -- 
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
> ]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
> 	
> 

----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA  94538
Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris@xxxxxxxx

Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS)
Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning
www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/>




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]