In addition to what said, I think that the most important think is that the submitted draft be examined by the community, or read by the community, this is what IESG needs to know the feeling in the community after being read. I hope all drafts be read at least by 3 of the community (not sure of statistics, known only by the IESG), because we don't want most of our RFCs only commented/read by the IETS :-) AB On 2/23/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Warren, > > I think IESG do ask for comments, and think that even +1 is a comment, > I prefer if the draft was a WG darft only participants out of the WG > can support. However, you SHOULD mention why you support that, is it > related to a technology, RFC or a WG works, SHOWing interest is > important to see how can the submitted darft be depended on in future. > Usually we don't want just to publish a draft that has few > interest/reason. > > Overall, it is the IESG or any sender to your account that SHOULD > specify what was the request about, so as your example, there is no > harm in support, > > Thanks for your input, > > AB >