:gs/nomcom/nomcom process/ On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:40:32AM -0800, David Kessens wrote: > > Sam, > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:32:59PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > > I don't think there is hair splitting going on here; I think the issues > > that are being raised are quite real and important. It's not the IESG's > > fault if the nomcom does x. It is the IESG's fault if the IESG takes on > > tasks delegated to the nomcom in RFC 3777. As you are aware, I have > > taken concerns I believe are best handled by the IAB and nomcom to the > > IAB and nomcom. > > The nomcom makes the appointments. > There is nothing the IESG can take away > from that. It is the nomcom that interprets the "requirements" from the > IESG. There is nothing the IESG can do about that. If you are unhappy how > the nomcom does the interpretation, contact the nomcom. > > David Kessens > ---