submission allowed + publication posted but not fully considered in the WG discussions? On Mar 7, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Submission allowed; publication postponed? > > /Elwyn > > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 10:34 +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Oh, and one more data point: >> >> The Internet-Draft archive also functions as a timestamped signed public archival record of our "inventions". >> (Which are often trivial, but triviality won't stop patenting of copycats, while a good priority more likely will.) >> >> This function is effectively suspended for six weeks a year. >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> >> PS.: (If that sounds like I'm contradicting myself that's only because we haven't found the right solution yet.) >> >> >> On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:49, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:18, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>>> routing around obstacles >>> >>> It turns out for most people the easiest route around is submitting in time. >>> >>> That is actually what counts here: how does the rule influence the behavior of people. >>> >>> Chair hat: WORKSFORME. (And, if I could decide it, WONTFIX.) >>> >>> Grüße, Carsten >> >