Re: Showing support during IETF LC...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,
At 17:29 22-02-2013, John Leslie wrote:
   IETF Consensus is presumed if folks are "sufficiently" notified and
post nothing pointing out unresolved issues. Thus "I support" and
"I oppose" are both meaningless (and Miss Manners would say, "Don't
do it.")

Yes.

The Last Call boilerplate says "substantive comments". One unproven theory is that it is for a person to clearly express what he or she thinks. It helps if the person can explain why he or she reached that conclusion.

   There is a theory, observed mostly in the breach, that discussion
on the <ietf> list will follow and resolve any issues raised by an
individual responding to the LastCall. When this happens, it is a
Good Thing (TM).

Yes.

"Whatever is true in one form of words is true in every other form of words which conveys the same meaning". The unproven theory is that the law of identity is applicable when there is a show of support during a Last Call.

Regards,
-sm


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]