On 2/25/13 7:02 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: > Or, I can change the "about" to "roughly". I think the number is > likely a tad higher. I'd actually guess that it's considerably higher, although I don't know that "I'd actually guess" is a useful metric. > [MB] It is an example and it's the only one I'm familiar with although > I assume other countries have similar laws. The last sentence > referencing the ADA is a very important distinction in terms of who is > required to obey the law, but perhaps it's not particular useful or > relevant to this document, so I can remove that sentence. [/MB] This probably goes to the broader question about this particular meeting (IETF 86( but I think it's important to note -somewhere- that just because a particular facility/building meets ADA requirements does not mean that the meeting is particularly accessible. I like this document, and I think it will also be very useful for people who would like to come to a meeting but unsure about being able to eat. I'd like to see it progress. Melinda