IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
- Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08.txt> (Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Last Call: <draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16.txt> (The PKCS#11 URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard: "x-" attribute use
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-08
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-10
- Re: last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
- Fwd: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-08
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- From: Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: Redundant email floods
- YANG advice and editing session on the next IETF"
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt
- Re: Redundant email floods
- last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
- Re: Redundant email floods
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Redundant email floods
- Re: Redundant email floods
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: Redundant email floods
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: Redundant email floods
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Redundant email floods
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [Ianaplan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-07.txt
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
- Re: slot attributes & last call
- IESG YANG Model Work Redistribution
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
- IETF 92 - Meeting and Hotel Information
- Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
- IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Networks aren't Internetworks Was: Call for Papers:
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: [CCAMP] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: December 18, starting at 20:00 UTC (formerly CCAMP WG Virtual Interim)
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06
- RE: [CCAMP] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: December 18, starting at 20:00 UTC (formerly CCAMP WG Virtual Interim)
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- one final last call comment on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
- Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply
- secdir review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-11
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01
- Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02.txt> (MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope) to Informational RFC
- Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- IETF Last Call comments to draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem
- Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02.txt> (MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope) to Informational RFC
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
- Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- RE: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt>
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
- Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- RE: Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04
- Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt>
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- RE: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- RE: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- YANG Just crashed and burned AFAIC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
- Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- CodeMatch update and review request
- Call for Review of draft-iab-iana-principles-01, "Principles for Operation of Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registries"
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
- RFC Status Change : RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- IAOC Selection Announcement
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- [IANAxfer] IANA: last call on protocol parameters proposal
- IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Curve (was Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard)
- Thanks Andrew
- From: Ajaharuddin Mohammad
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Curve (was Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard)
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Curve (was Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard)
- IPv6 Adoption Curve (was Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard)
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- RE: [CCAMP] CCAMP WG Virtual Interim Meeting: December 18, starting at 20:00 UTC
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Call for nominations: IETF appointments to the ISOC Board of Trustees
- From: IAB Executive Administrative Manager
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- From: Christian de Larrinaga
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
- Please comment on ICANN TLG Candidates
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01.txt> (HTTP Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect) to Proposed Standard (from Experimental))
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Last Call: <status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01.txt> (HTTP Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect) to Proposed Standard (from Experimental))
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04
- Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Encoding mLDP FECs in the NLRI of BGP MCAST-VPN Routes' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-10.txt)
- Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13
- Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- RE: Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06
- Re: Observations regarding IANA Parameter Registries response from IETF
- Observations regarding IANA Parameter Registries response from IETF
- Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-23.txt
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- RE: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: I-D Action: draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-00.txt
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Re: CFP: 1st Cyber-Physical System Security Workshop (CPSS 2015)
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- CFP: The 11th Information Security Practice and Experience Conference (ISPEC 2015)
- CFP: 1st Cyber-Physical System Security Workshop (CPSS 2015)
- RE: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- RE: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
- Thanks for the change in discussions
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-16
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Tropical/resort meetings in germany
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tram-alpn-07
- RE: Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Re: Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
- Two minor last call comments on draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08.txt
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-16
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-16
- Gen-art LC review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-16
- Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- RE: [OPSEC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04.txt> (DHCPv6-Shield: Protecting Against Rogue DHCPv6 Servers) to Best Current Practice
- [Sip-implementors] Clarification Required on section 7.4 RFC 3966
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tram-alpn-07
- Please comment on IAOC candidates for IAB selection
- Changes to the text
- From: Ajaharuddin Mohammad
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Re: IESG Teleconference Participation for November 25, 2014
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Internet Society Board Statement on NETmundial Initiative
- Call for eBook Chapters on "Sustainable Computing"
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: kudos to meetecho people
- Re: 3rd GAIA workshop at the ACM DEV 5
- From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- Re: 3rd GAIA workshop at the ACM DEV 5
- Re: kudos to meetecho people
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IAB Statement on Internet Confidentiality
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Fwd: kudos to meetecho people
- Phone Calls in the IETF meeting (was Re: [manet] Skype?)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 98 - Montreal!
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- IETF 95 - Buenos Aires!
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- IAB Statement on Internet Confidentiality
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Gentle Reminder: in front of IETF registration Desk at 7:15
- Re: Gentle Reminder: Tomorrow (13 Nov. 7 PM) in front of IETF registration Desk
- IETF 92 - Registration is now open!
- "Nerds in Paradise" T-Shirt Project
- Re: [Dart] WG Action: Conclusion of DiffServ Applied to Real-time Transports (dart)
- DTN and nomcom
- Re: IETF 98 - Montreal!
- Re: kudos to meetecho people
- Re: remote presentation fun
- 3rd GAIA workshop at the ACM DEV 5
- From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- remote presentation fun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: kudos to meetecho people
- Re: kudos to meetecho people
- Fwd: kudos to meetecho people
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Off-topic: Statement to present at World Internet Conference @ Wuzhen
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-12
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-12
- RE: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- From: Miaofuyou (Miao Fuyou)
- RE: [rmcat] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt> (Congestion Control Requirements For RMCAT) to Informational RFC
- From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Gentle Reminder: Tomorrow (13 Nov. 7 PM) in front of IETF registration Desk
- Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]