IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• YANG Model Coordination Group - seeking candidates
  • From: Benoit Claise
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Re[2]: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Updating BCP 10 -- some minor bits
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: Robin Wilton
• Re: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: Robin Wilton
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Chris Dailey
• Re: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: Carsten Schiefner
• Re: [Internet Policy] Fwd: Re[2]: Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: Alejandro Pisanty
• Fwd: Re[2]: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• Re[2]: [Internet Policy] Coca Cola applies to protect Twitter Hastags.
  • From: mohammed serrhini
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Greg Wilkins
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Milton L Mueller
• IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Seun Ojedeji
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Request for Proposals: Software Development
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Allison Mankin
• RE: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Milton L Mueller
• RE: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Doug Barton
• Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
• RE: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Milton L Mueller
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: James M Snell
• Applied Networking Research Prize 2015 presentation at IETF-92
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Appointment to the ICANN Technical Liaison Group
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Maddy Conner
• Re: IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Stephanie McCammon
• Re: IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Bernie Volz (volz)
• RE: IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Bernie Volz (volz)
• IETF-91 proceedings?
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: [secdir] Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Randy Bush
• RE: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: [dnssd] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt> (Requirements for Scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extensions) to Informational RFC
  • From: Markus Stenberg
• Re: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jaroslav Imrich
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Tony Hansen
• RE: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• RE: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06.txt> (Recommendations for Transport Port Number Uses) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-in-udp-09
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• "nothing of importance" (was: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: John Levine
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Delan Azabani
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Sector Review: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09
  • From: Olafur Gudmundsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Comments about draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16 : Connection reuse
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Delan Azabani
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Nico Williams
• Reconsider TLS/CFRG relationship (Re: should the CFRG really strive for consensus?)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Last Call: <draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16.txt> (The PKCS#11 URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard: new draft 17
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Last Call: <draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16.txt> (The PKCS#11 URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard: new draft 17
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: Review Request for draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: Nico Williams
• i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Yoav Nir
• RE: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• term for 3rd RTG AD
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of-area ADs)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Nico Williams
• RE: [http-auth] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-08
  • From: Black, David
• Third RTG AD [Was: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [http-auth] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-08
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-08
  • From: Black, David
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Black, David
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• WGs/AD [IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Huub van Helvoort
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Robert Sparks
• IETF areas re-organisation steps
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-01
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Tinka
• [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08.txt> (Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Gottlieb, Jordan J
• Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Last Call: <draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16.txt> (The PKCS#11 URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard: "x-" attribute use
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-08
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: IAB Chair
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-10
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Fwd: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-08
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Tinka
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: Warren Kumari
• YANG advice and editing session on the next IETF"
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Last Call: <draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04.txt> (Increasing the Number of Area Directors in an IETF Area) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Tinka
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Tinka
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jaroslav Imrich
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jaroslav Imrich
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Jan Pechanec
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Darren J Moffat
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Darren J Moffat
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Redundant email floods
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: ned+ietf
• Redundant email floods
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [saag] PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
• Re: [Ianaplan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-07.txt
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: slot attributes & last call
  • From: Nico Williams
• IESG YANG Model Work Redistribution
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Tinka
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: t.p.
• Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• IETF 92 - Meeting and Hotel Information
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
  • From: Michael Richardson
• RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-14.txt> (Updates to LDP for IPv6) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: [http-auth] Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07.txt> (HTTP Origin-Bound Authentication (HOBA)) to Experimental RFC
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: 🔓Dan Wing
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: 🔓Dan Wing
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Black, David
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-07
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Networks aren't Internetworks Was: Call for Papers:
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [CCAMP] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: December 18, starting at 20:00 UTC (formerly CCAMP WG Virtual Interim)
  • From: Lou Berger
• Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: [CCAMP] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: December 18, starting at 20:00 UTC (formerly CCAMP WG Virtual Interim)
  • From: Fatai Zhang
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• one final last call comment on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
• Re: Android and IPv6 was [Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard]
  • From: George, Wes
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Huitema
• secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply
  • From: Sean Turner
• secdir review of draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06
  • From: Sean Turner
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: James Woodyatt
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
• Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lee Howard
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Nico Williams
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-11
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Nico Williams
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Black, David
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Manger, James
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lee Howard
• Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-04
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Nico Williams
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jefsey
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Roll] Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02.txt> (MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope) to Informational RFC
  • From: peter van der Stok
• Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• IETF Last Call comments to draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem
  • From: Gregory Mirsky
• Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Doug Royer
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Lee Howard
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02.txt> (MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope) to Informational RFC
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: t.p.
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: t.p.
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: John Bradley
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
• Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Phil Hunt
• RE: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt>
  • From: Milton L Mueller
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Closing down draft-secretaries-good-practices
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: t.p.
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt>
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• RE: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: "Martin J. Dürst"
• Re: Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: manning bill
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of) draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Eric Burger
• RE: [Unbearable] New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Mike Jones
• YANG Just crashed and burned AFAIC
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Måns Nilsson
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Hector Santos
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: Last Call: Correct classification of RFC 20 (ASCII format) to Internet Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: Derek Atkins
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: John Cowan
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Thomas D. Nadeau
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
  • From: Benoit Claise
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: l.wood
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: l.wood
• Re: Status of RFC 20
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
• Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• CodeMatch update and review request
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Call for Review of draft-iab-iana-principles-01, "Principles for Operation of Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registries"
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: 🔓Dan Wing
• Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: unbearable
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  • From: Black, David
• RFC Status Change : RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Seth Johnson
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [IAB] IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: IAB statement on the NETmundial Initiative
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Lemon