Stephen Farrell wrote: > > I've looked back at the IETF LC for this and chatted with the > TLS chairs and my conclusion is that we did end up with rough > consensus for this so I've put it on the Feb 19 IESG telechat. > > I think Sean's shepherd writeup [1] did a fine job of capturing > the LC outcome there so I won't try better that. Has the IESG given up on "technical leadership", and into rubberstamping? Improving the downgrade-scsv proposal to make it suck *MUCH* less would be trivial, and this would be a prime candidate for the IESG to bounce the current proposal back to the WG and ask them to FIX IT or be gone. -Martin