mcr> So anyone can upload at any time. If the WG takes your document on,
mcr> then the datatracker clearly knows this, so that part is easy to check.
mcr> If you draft-author- is scheduled, this will require some additional
mcr> datatracker effort for the WG chairs to indicate that your document
mcr> goes into
mcr> the agenda... but, I we wanted to be able to track which documents were
mcr> discussed into which WG anyway for all sorts of reasons, so I think
mcr> that his
mcr> work will already happen.
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I worry that this criterion will result in people being even more
> aggressive about scheduling talks on documents that were never
> discussed on the mailing list.
I too worried about that when I wrote it.
I then considered that this is a form of gaming the system, and if the chairs
are participating in it, then this is a problem. This gaming occurs now
without any (nomcom-eligible) reward, and I think it has other root causes,
which if we could discover we could address.
Or to put it differently: we already have this problem, and we already need
to fix it.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature