Thank you for the (re)review, Robert. FWIW, I have also reviewed this specification and believe that its recommendations are correct and appropriate, within the limits of my expertise. I have placed a “yes” position for this document on today’s IESG telechat. Jari On 13 Feb 2015, at 06:37, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-09 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 12 Feb 2015 > IETF LC End Date: past > IESG Telechat date: 19 Feb 2015 > > Summary: Ready for publication as BCP > > All of the points from my LC review of -08 have been well addressed. > > Thanks again for producing such an exceptionally clear document. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail