Actually I thought it had ample support, but just needed some clarification about how it would work when stretched over longer time frames.
On Feb 11, 2015 8:34 AM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (b) Michael's suggestion to re-work eligibility (needs more discussion or
> an actual text proposal).
So far, I'm not hearing much support or any clear opposition for the idea.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-