I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2015-02-11
IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-16
IESG Telechat date: N/A.
Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track
RFC (with nits).
Major issues:
Minor issues:
In Section 4:
"LSF" is used for the first time without being expanded. I suggest you
introduce the abbreviation in the terminology section.
In Section 5:
Label Description: - what is the allowed character set for this field?
Is it ASCII? Is it UTF-8 with some restrictions?
>Status: A short ASCII text string indicating the status of an entry
> in the registry. The status field for most entries should have
> the value "active". In the case that a label format selection
> entry is obsolete, the status field of the obsoleted entry should
> be "obsoleted by entry NNN".
What is entry NNN? Is it a document reference (e.g. An RFC)? Is it
possible to obsolete without such entry?
In Section 5.3 - is it possible to update a label description document
without requesting a new label? For example if changes are editorial and
don't significantly affect label syntax and model.
Nits/editorial comments: