On 14/02/2015 09:53, Dave Cridland wrote: ... > c) I suspect that whichever way we do this, the potential influence of a WG > Chair increases as a result, and I'm unaware of an appeal action for WG > Chair selection. This might be my own ignorance, but either way we'll need > one. I don't know if it's happened, but the IESG would IMHO be very foolish to refuse to consider an appeal against WG Chair selection. Any action by an AD should be appealable in principle, IMHO, even if not explictly mentioned in RFC 2026 or RFC 2418. Brian