On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Sean Turner <turners@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:16, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I propose that this document skip PS, and go straight to Internet Standard to >> accurately reflect the status of this document. > > Six months after it gets an RFC# I’d completely support this. Good god, no. HTTP/2 is quite complex, and it is likely that at least some parts will turn out to be non-optimal. Please give the HTTPBIS WG at least a year to shake out the protocol after wide deployment and constant use. Rushing the WG just so we can feel good about slapping a near-meaningless feel-good label on the spec is not a good process. Counter-proposal: we let the people closest to the protocol, the WG that created it, decide when to ask for STD status. --Paul Hoffman